Changes

<math>133755457655037A  </math>

<math>133755457655037A  </math>

<br />Let's pretend that we are Martians in possession of the right key (algorithm or context) the A key that corresponds to the 'Real Context'. We would be able to perfectly decrypt the message, as you can verify by entering the code in the appropriate window:  

<br /><translate>Let's pretend that we are Martians in possession of the right key (algorithm or context) the A key that corresponds to the 'Real Context'. We would be able to perfectly decrypt the message, as you can verify by entering the code in the appropriate window</translate>:  

{{q2|Ephaptic|}}

{{q2|Ephaptic|}}

But, luckily or not, we are not Martians, so we will use, contextually to the information acquired from the social and scientific context, the dental key that correspond to B key, with the consequent decryption of the message into:   

<translate>But, luckily or not, we are not Martians, so we will use, contextually to the information acquired from the social and scientific context, the dental key that correspond to B key, with the consequent decryption of the message into</translate>:   

{{q2|5GoI49E5!|}}

{{q2|5GoI49E5!|}}

Using the C key that corresponds to the neurological context, the decryption of the message would be:  

<translate>Using the C key that corresponds to the neurological context, the decryption of the message would be</translate>:  

{{q2|26k81n_g+|}}

{{q2|26k81n_g+|}}

These are extraordinarily interesting elements of language logic, and please note that the encrypted message of the real context ‘meaning’ of the ‘disease’, the A key, is totally different from the one encrypted through the B keys and the C key: they are constructed in conventionally different contexts, while there is only one reality and this indicates a hypothetical '''diagnostic error'''.

<translate>These are extraordinarily interesting elements of language logic, and please note that the encrypted message of the real context ‘meaning’ of the ‘disease’, the A key, is totally different from the one encrypted through the B keys and the C key: they are constructed in conventionally different contexts, while there is only one reality and this indicates a hypothetical '''diagnostic error'''.</translate>

This means that medical language logics mainly built on an extension of verbal language, are not very efficient in being quick and detailed in diagnostics, especially the differential one. This is because the distortion due to the ambiguity and semantic vagueness of the linguistic expression, called ‘vagueness epistemic’ or ‘epistemic uncertainty’, or better ‘uncertain knowledge’, forcibly directs the diagnosis towards the '''specialist reference context''' and not on the exact and real one.  

<translate>This means that medical language logics mainly built on an extension of verbal language, are not very efficient in being quick and detailed in diagnostics, especially the differential one. This is because the distortion due to the ambiguity and semantic vagueness of the linguistic expression, called ‘vagueness epistemic’ or ‘epistemic uncertainty’, or better ‘uncertain knowledge’, forcibly directs the diagnosis towards the '''specialist reference context''' and not on the exact and real one.</translate>

{{q4|Why, then, are we relatively successful in diagnostics? |An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

{{q4|<translate>Why, then, are we relatively successful in diagnostics?</translate> |<translate>An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.</translate>}}

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

<translate>Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning.</translate> <translate>A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice.</translate> <translate>Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence.</translate> <translate>In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions</translate><ref>{{cite book  

  | autore = Vanstone M

  | autore = Vanstone M

  | autore2 = Monteiro S

  | autore2 = Monteiro S

  }}</ref>

  }}</ref>

Therefore, there is a need for:  

<translate>Therefore, there is a need for</translate>:  

{{q4|A System Logic that integrates the sequence of the machine language code|true! we'll get there with a little patience}}

{{q4|<translate>A System Logic that integrates the sequence of the machine language code</translate>|<translate>true! we'll get there with a little patience</translate>}}

==<translate>Final Considerations</translate>==

==<translate>Final Considerations</translate>==