Line 592: |
Line 592: |
| #<translate>Induction or hypothesis testing</translate>. | | #<translate>Induction or hypothesis testing</translate>. |
| | | |
− | In the final part of the study conducted by Donald E Stanley and Daniel G Campos, the Peircean logic is considered as an aid to guaranteeing the effectiveness of the diagnostic passage from populations to individuals. A diagnosis focuses on the individual signs and symptoms of a disease. This manifestation cannot be extrapolated from the general population, except for a very broad experiential sense, and it is this sense of experience that provides clinical insight, strengthens the instinct to interpret perceptions, and grounds the competence that allows us to act. We acquire basic knowledge and validate experience in order to transfer our observations into the diagnosis. | + | <translate>In the final part of the study conducted by Donald E Stanley and Daniel G Campos, the Peircean logic is considered as an aid to guaranteeing the effectiveness of the diagnostic passage from populations to individuals.</translate> <translate>A diagnosis focuses on the individual signs and symptoms of a disease</translate>. <translate>This manifestation cannot be extrapolated from the general population, except for a very broad experiential sense, and it is this sense of experience that provides clinical insight, strengthens the instinct to interpret perceptions, and grounds the competence that allows us to act</translate>. <translate>We acquire basic knowledge and validate experience in order to transfer our observations into the diagnosis</translate>. |
| | | |
− | In another recent study, author Pat Croskerry<ref name=":1">{{cite book | + | <translate>In another recent study, author Pat Croskerry proposes the so-called "Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making", in which a more effective clinical decision could be achieved through adaptive reasoning, leading to advanced levels of competence and mastery</translate><ref name=":1">{{cite book |
| | autore = Croskerry P | | | autore = Croskerry P |
| | titolo = Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making | | | titolo = Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making |
Line 608: |
Line 608: |
| | DOI = 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898 | | | DOI = 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898 |
| | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore --> | | | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore --> |
− | }}Pat . [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30033794/?from_term=%22Logic+classic%22&from_filter=simsearch3.fft&from_filter=pubt.review&from_pos=7 ]. . Aug;40(8):803-808. doi: .Epub 2018 Jul 23</ref> proposes the so-called "Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making", in which a more effective clinical decision could be achieved through adaptive reasoning, leading to advanced levels of competence and mastery. | + | }}</ref>. |
| | | |
− | Adaptive competencies can be obtained by emphasizing the additional features of the reasoning process: | + | <translate>Adaptive competencies can be obtained by emphasizing the additional features of the reasoning process</translate>: |
| | | |
| #Be aware of the inhibitors and facilitators of rationality (Specialists are unwittingly projected towards their own scientific and clinical context). | | #Be aware of the inhibitors and facilitators of rationality (Specialists are unwittingly projected towards their own scientific and clinical context). |