Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, push-subscription-manager, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, widgeteditor
17,894
edits
Changes
no edit summary
The evaluation criteria were divided into two categories that involve methodological considerations and clinical considerations.
The evaluation criteria were divided into two categories that involve methodological considerations and clinical considerations.
The end of the research came to the elimination, due to a lack of scientific and clinical validation, of a series of instrumental diagnostic methodologies like interferential electromyography (EMG Interference Pattern), Pantography, X-ray diagnostics, etc. These will be described in more detail in the next editions of Masticationpedia. This first target was, therefore, the scientific request of an "objective data"' and not generated by opinions, schools of thought or subjective evaluations of the phenomenon’. During the Workshop of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) of 2008, preliminary results of the RDC/TMDs were presented in the endeavour to validate the project. The conclusion was that to achieve a review and simultaneous validation of [RDC/TMD], it is essential that the tests should be able to make a differential diagnosis between TMD patients with pain and subjects without pain, and above all, discriminate against patients with TMD pain from patients with orofacial pain without TMD. <ref>Lobbezoo F, Visscher CM, Naeije M., Some remarks on the RDC/TMD Validation Project: report of an IADR/Toronto-2008 workshopdiscussion. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Oct;37(10):779-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02091.x. Epub 2010 Mar 29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Some+remarks+on+the+RDC%2FTMD+Validation+Project%3A+report+of+an+IADR%2FToronto-2008+workshop+discussion.+J+Oral+Rehabil%2C+2010
The end of the research came to the elimination, due to a lack of scientific and clinical validation, of a series of instrumental diagnostic methodologies like interferential electromyography (EMG Interference Pattern), Pantography, X-ray diagnostics, etc. These will be described in more detail in the next editions of Masticationpedia. This first target was, therefore, the scientific request of an "objective data"' and not generated by opinions, schools of thought or subjective evaluations of the phenomenon’. During the Workshop of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) of 2008, preliminary results of the RDC/TMDs were presented in the endeavour to validate the project. The conclusion was that to achieve a review and simultaneous validation of [RDC/TMD], it is essential that the tests should be able to make a differential diagnosis between TMD patients with pain and subjects without pain, and above all, discriminate against patients with TMD pain from patients with orofacial pain without TMD.<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Lobbezoo F
| autore2 = Visscher CM
| autore3 = Naeije M
| autore4 =
| autore5 =
| autore6 =
| autore7 =
| autore8 =
| autore9 =
| autore10 =
| autore11 =
| autore12 =
| titolo = Some remarks on the RDC/TMD Validation Project: report of an IADR/Toronto-2008 workshop discussion
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02091.x
| volume =
| opera = J Oral Rehabil
| anno = 2010
| editore = Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
| città = Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| ISBN =
| PMID = 20374440
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02091.x
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>
This last article, reconsidering pain as an essential symptom for the clinical interpretation, puts all the neurophysiological phenomenology in the game, not just this.
This last article, reconsidering pain as an essential symptom for the clinical interpretation, puts all the neurophysiological phenomenology in the game, not just this.