Changes

Saying from the perspective of observation of this type, the Logic of Predicates  can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u> is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(a_1,a_2,.....a_n)</math>which give the dentist the complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD or she has not (for everything A can be either B or not B, no other state of truth is possible).

Saying from the perspective of observation of this type, the Logic of Predicates  can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u> is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(a_1,a_2,.....a_n)</math>which give the dentist the complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD or she has not (for everything A can be either B or not B, no other state of truth is possible).

[[File:Question 2.jpg|sinistra|100x100px]]{{q2|....and if with the advancement of research new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right instead of the dentist?|}}Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions <math>(a_1,a_2,.....a_n)</math> in coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions <math>(b_1,b_2,.....b_n)</math> were shown to be coherent which would make a different sentence compatible <math>\Im</math> like: could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder (_nOP) and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders?

{{q4|....and if with the advancement of research new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right instead of the dentist?|}}

 

Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions <math>(a_1,a_2,.....a_n)</math> in coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions <math>(b_1,b_2,.....b_n)</math> were shown to be coherent which would make a different sentence compatible <math>\Im</math> like: could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder (_nOP) and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders?

In the current medical language logic such assertions remain only assertions because the convictions and opinions do not allow a consequent and quick change of the mindset.

In the current medical language logic such assertions remain only assertions because the convictions and opinions do not allow a consequent and quick change of the mindset.

We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic ...

We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic ...

[[File:Question 2.jpg|sinistra|100x100px]]{{q2|... then can we think of a Probabilistic Language Logic?|perhaps}}

{{q4|... then can we think of a Probabilistic Language Logic?|perhaps}}

{{Btnav|The logic of medical language|The logic of probabilistic language}}

{{Btnav|The logic of medical language|The logic of probabilistic language}}