Changes

{{q4|Pourquoi, alors, réussissons-nous relativement bien dans les diagnostics ? |Une encyclopédie à part entière serait nécessaire pour répondre à cette question, mais sans aller trop loin, essayons d'en discuter les raisons.}}

{{q4|Pourquoi, alors, réussissons-nous relativement bien dans les diagnostics ? |Une encyclopédie à part entière serait nécessaire pour répondre à cette question, mais sans aller trop loin, essayons d'en discuter les raisons.}}

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

L'intuition diagnostique de base est un mode de raisonnement rapide, non analytique et inconscient. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

  | autore = Vanstone M

  | autore = Vanstone M

  | autore2 = Monteiro S

  | autore2 = Monteiro S