| − | Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.
| + | Biorąc powyższe pod uwagę, na powierzchownym spojrzeniu na epistemiczną ewolucję nauki, dwa aspekty dyscypliny ("''Fizyczny paradygmat nauki''", podkreślając anomalię) i interdyscyplinarny ("''Inżynierski paradygmat nauki''" , rusztowanie metapoznawcze), mogą wydawać się ze sobą w konflikcie; w rzeczywistości jednak, jak zaraz zobaczymy w tym rozdziale, są to dwie strony tego samego medalu, ponieważ obie mają tendencję do generowania „paradygmatycznych innowacji” bez żadnego konfliktu. |
| | Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro | | Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro |