Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,492
edits
Changes
no edit summary
''<translate><!--T:3--> We would like our reader to have an immediate perception of the topics that will be debated in '''[[Masticationpedia]]'''; we will review some of the most current issues concerning the epistemological evolution of science in general, and medical as well as dental medicine in particular.</translate> <br><br><translate><!--T:4--> You can also watch a [https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYlmVJLgEzIeVdFudy_8VImh1x0riDiTc video of ours] on Youtube, for your convenience. </translate>
''<translate><!--T:3--> We would like our reader to have an immediate perception of the topics that will be debated in '''[[Masticationpedia]]'''; we will review some of the most current issues concerning the epistemological evolution of science in general, and medical as well as dental medicine in particular.</translate> <br><br><translate><!--T:4--> You can also watch a [https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYlmVJLgEzIeVdFudy_8VImh1x0riDiTc video of ours] on Youtube, for your convenience. </translate>''
''
<div style="display: inline-block; float:left; margin:0.3em; padding: 0.5em;">
<div style="display: inline-block; float:left; margin:0.3em; padding: 0.5em;">
|}
|}
==<translate><!--T:74--> Anomaly ''vs.'' Interdisciplinarity</translate>==
==<translate><!--T:74--> Disciplinarity ''vs.'' Interdisciplinarity</translate>==
<translate><!--T:75--> Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.</translate>
<translate><!--T:75--> Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.</translate>