Changes

|}

|}

Now the conclusion remains very critical because we might be finding ourselves in front of a verbal language of the patient which is misleading because it is not specific and does not respond to a detailed physiopathogenetic knowledge of the occlusal state; or, paradoxically, we are otherwise facing a machine language converted into verbal language which guarantees the integrity of the system. At this point the situation is truly embarrassing because neither the patient nor the observer (dentist) will be able to say with certainty that the System is in a “Malocclusion” state.

Теперь вывод остается очень важным, потому что мы можем оказаться перед устным языком пациента, который вводит в заблуждение, потому что он не является специфическим и не отвечает на подробные физиопатогенетические знания о окклюзионном состоянии; или, как это ни парадоксально, мы имеем дело с машинным языком, преобразованным в вербальный язык, который гарантирует целостность системы. На данный момент ситуация действительно неловкая, потому что ни пациент, ни наблюдатель (дантист) не могут с уверенностью сказать, что Система находится в состоянии «неправильного прикуса».

[[File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|alt=|left|thumb|'''Figure 1c:''' Mandibular reflex evoked by percussion of the chin through a triggered neurological hammer. <br>Note the functional symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]

[[File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|alt=|left|thumb|'''Figure 1c:''' Mandibular reflex evoked by percussion of the chin through a triggered neurological hammer. <br>Note the functional symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]

It is precisely at this moment that one remembers the criticism of the American Statistician Association titled “''Statistical inference in the 21st century: A World Beyond p <0.05''”, which urges the researcher to accept uncertainty, be sensible reflective, open and modest in his statements<ref name="wasser" />: which basically translates into a search for interdisciplinarity.

It is precisely at this moment that one remembers the criticism of the American Statistician Association titled “''Statistical inference in the 21st century: A World Beyond p <0.05''”, which urges the researcher to accept uncertainty, be sensible reflective, open and modest in his statements<ref name="wasser" />: which basically translates into a search for interdisciplinarity.