Changes

no edit summary
Line 355: Line 355:     
{{q4|.... I understand the progress of Science described by the authors but I don't understand the change of thought|I'll give you a practical example}}
 
{{q4|.... I understand the progress of Science described by the authors but I don't understand the change of thought|I'll give you a practical example}}
This example is Classical Language Logic, as we are going to explain in detail, but now a doubt arises: At the time when orthodontic and orthographic axioms were building protocols confirmed by the International Scientific Community, they were aware of the information we talked about in the introduction. Certainly not because time (tn) is the bearer of information but despite this cognitive limit we proceeded with a very questionable Classical Language Logic for the safety of the citizen.
+
 
    
In the chapter "[[Introduction]]" we  posed certain questions on the subject of malocclusion but in this context we simulate the dentist's logic of medical language when faced with the clinical case presented in the "Introduction chapter" with its diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions.
 
In the chapter "[[Introduction]]" we  posed certain questions on the subject of malocclusion but in this context we simulate the dentist's logic of medical language when faced with the clinical case presented in the "Introduction chapter" with its diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions.
Line 432: Line 432:  
If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic'  (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter) the conclusions would be surprising.
 
If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic'  (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter) the conclusions would be surprising.
   −
If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion) and we shallnotice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void until they guarantee a post-treatment that maintains a State of Coherence of the system in question.
+
If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion) and we shallnotice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void until they guarantee a post-treatment that maintains a State of Coherence of the system in question tested before treatment.
    
<gallery mode="packed-hover" widths="250" heights="182" perrow="3">
 
<gallery mode="packed-hover" widths="250" heights="182" perrow="3">
Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,492

edits