Changes

== Neutralidade de conteúdo ==

== Neutralidade de conteúdo ==

Embora um dos valores mais preciosos trazidos ao conhecimento pela Wikipedia seja o relato neutro de informações<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

Embora um dos valores mais preciosos trazidos ao conhecimento pela Wikipedia seja o relato neutro de informações<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, em que os dados são apresentados sem endossar ou rejeitar, atribuindo (e portanto redirecionando) as avaliações relativas às fontes, na Masticationpedia seria extremamente difícil afirmar que há possibilidades de permanecer neutro na apresentação de conteúdos que nascem no coração da investigação científica: a Masticationpedia tem por finalidade a produção de novos conteúdos, não [ainda] historicizados nas visões generalistas, podendo antes, pela sua própria natureza, favorecer a proposição de inovações que, como tais, não têm de ser neutras (nem poderia ser), mas ortodoxo de acordo com o método científico<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.