Changes

  Se você é um Profissional ou Acadêmico, se você tem uma competência pertinente e deseja colaborar na construção de novos conhecimentos nos setores de nosso interesse, por favor [[Special:Contact|contact us]]: A Masticationpedia deseja interagir com qualquer pessoa trazendo-nos conceitos científicos para compartilhar, e espera poder aumentar o conhecimento por este caminho tão especial.

  Se você é um Profissional ou Acadêmico, se você tem uma competência pertinente e deseja colaborar na construção de novos conhecimentos nos setores de nosso interesse, por favor [[Special:Contact|contact us]]: A Masticationpedia deseja interagir com qualquer pessoa trazendo-nos conceitos científicos para compartilhar, e espera poder aumentar o conhecimento por este caminho tão especial.

== Content neutrality ==

== Neutralidade de conteúdo ==

While one of the most precious values brought by Wikipedia to knowledge is the neutral reporting of information<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

While one of the most precious values brought by Wikipedia to knowledge is the neutral reporting of information<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.