Changes

  Wenn Sie ein Fachmann oder ein Gelehrter sind, über eine entsprechende Kompetenz verfügen und beim Aufbau neuen Wissens in den Bereichen unseres Interesses mitarbeiten möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an [[Special:Contact|contact us]]: Masticationpedia möchte mit jedem interagieren bringt uns wissenschaftliche Konzepte zum Austausch und hofft, auf diesem ganz besonderen Weg das Wissen erweitern zu können.

  Wenn Sie ein Fachmann oder ein Gelehrter sind, über eine entsprechende Kompetenz verfügen und beim Aufbau neuen Wissens in den Bereichen unseres Interesses mitarbeiten möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an [[Special:Contact|contact us]]: Masticationpedia möchte mit jedem interagieren bringt uns wissenschaftliche Konzepte zum Austausch und hofft, auf diesem ganz besonderen Weg das Wissen erweitern zu können.

== Content neutrality ==

== Inhaltsneutralität ==

While one of the most precious values brought by Wikipedia to knowledge is the neutral reporting of information<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

While one of the most precious values brought by Wikipedia to knowledge is the neutral reporting of information<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.