Changes

== Neutralité du contenu ==

== Neutralité du contenu ==

Alors que l'une des valeurs les plus précieuses apportées par Wikipédia à la connaissance est le reportage neutre des informations<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

Alors que l'une des valeurs les plus précieuses apportées par Wikipédia à la connaissance est le reportage neutre des informations<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, dans lequel les données sont présentées sans les approuver ou les rejeter, en attribuant (et donc en redirigeant) les évaluations relatives aux sources, dans Masticationpedia, il serait extrêmement difficile d'affirmer qu'il existe des possibilités de rester neutre en présentant un contenu né dans le cœur de la recherche scientifique : Masticationpedia a pour finalité la production de contenus nouveaux, non [encore] historicisés dans des visions généralistes, et pourrait plutôt, de par sa nature même, favoriser la proposition d'innovations qui, en tant que telles, n'ont pas à être neutres (ni ne pourrait l'être), mais orthodoxe selon la méthode scientifique<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.