− | Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.
| + | Diante do exposto, numa visão superficial da evolução epistêmica da Ciência, os dois aspectos da disciplinaridade ("'' Paradigma da Física da Ciência ''", destacando a anomalia) e Interdisciplinar ("'' Paradigma da Engenharia da Ciência ''" , andaime metacognitivo), podem parecer estar em conflito um com o outro; na realidade, entretanto, como veremos bem neste capítulo, eles são os dois lados da mesma moeda, porque ambos tendem a gerar "inovação paradigmática" sem nenhum conflito. |
| Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro | | Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro |