Changes

#Prueba de inducción o hipótesis.

#Prueba de inducción o hipótesis.

En la parte final del estudio realizado por Donald E Stanley y Daniel G Campos, se considera la lógica peirceana como una ayuda para garantizar la efectividad del paso del diagnóstico de poblaciones a individuos. A diagnosis focuses on the individual signs and symptoms of a disease. This manifestation cannot be extrapolated from the general population, except for a very broad experiential sense, and it is this sense of experience that provides clinical insight, strengthens the instinct to interpret perceptions, and grounds the competence that allows us to act. We acquire basic knowledge and validate experience in order to transfer our observations into the diagnosis.  

En la parte final del estudio realizado por Donald E Stanley y Daniel G Campos, se considera la lógica peirceana como una ayuda para garantizar la efectividad del paso del diagnóstico de poblaciones a individuos. Un diagnóstico se centra en los signos y síntomas individuales de una enfermedad.. This manifestation cannot be extrapolated from the general population, except for a very broad experiential sense, and it is this sense of experience that provides clinical insight, strengthens the instinct to interpret perceptions, and grounds the competence that allows us to act. We acquire basic knowledge and validate experience in order to transfer our observations into the diagnosis.  

In another recent study, author Pat Croskerry proposes the so-called "Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making", in which a more effective clinical decision could be achieved through adaptive reasoning, leading to advanced levels of competence and mastery<ref name=":1">{{cite book  

In another recent study, author Pat Croskerry proposes the so-called "Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making", in which a more effective clinical decision could be achieved through adaptive reasoning, leading to advanced levels of competence and mastery<ref name=":1">{{cite book