Changes

Esto significa que las lógicas del lenguaje médico construidas principalmente sobre una extensión del lenguaje verbal, no son muy eficientes en ser rápidas y detalladas en los diagnósticos, especialmente en el diferencial. Esto se debe a que la distorsión debida a la ambigüedad y vaguedad semántica de la expresión lingüística, denominada 'vaguedad epistémica' o 'incertidumbre epistémica', o mejor 'conocimiento incierto', dirige de manera forzosa el diagnóstico hacia el '' 'contexto de referencia especializado' ''. y no en el exacto y real.  

Esto significa que las lógicas del lenguaje médico construidas principalmente sobre una extensión del lenguaje verbal, no son muy eficientes en ser rápidas y detalladas en los diagnósticos, especialmente en el diferencial. Esto se debe a que la distorsión debida a la ambigüedad y vaguedad semántica de la expresión lingüística, denominada 'vaguedad epistémica' o 'incertidumbre epistémica', o mejor 'conocimiento incierto', dirige de manera forzosa el diagnóstico hacia el '' 'contexto de referencia especializado' ''. y no en el exacto y real.  

{{q4|Why, then, are we relatively successful in diagnostics? |An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

{{q4|Entonces, ¿por qué tenemos relativamente éxito en el diagnóstico? |An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book