Changes

  }}</ref>.  

  }}</ref>.  

It is self-evident that an observer with a ''deterministic mindset'' facing a phenomenon of such evident occlusal incongruity considers crossbite and openbite the cause of malocclusion (cause/effect) or vice versa; and it is obvious, as well, that the observer recommends an orthodontic treatment to restore a “Normocclusion”. This way of reasoning means that the model (masticatory system) is “normalized to occlusion”; and if read backwards, it means that the occlusal discrepancy is the cause of malocclusion and, therefore, of disease of the Masticatory System. (Figure 1a).  

Il va de soi qu'un observateur avec un ''état d'esprit déterministe'' confronté à un phénomène d'incongruité occlusale aussi évidente considère l'occlusion croisée et l'occlusion ouverte comme la cause de la malocclusion (cause/effet) ou vice versa ; et il est évident, aussi, que l'observateur recommande un traitement orthodontique pour restaurer une « Normocclusion ». Cette façon de raisonner signifie que le modèle (système masticatoire) est « normalisé à l'occlusion » ; et si lu à l'envers, cela signifie que l'écart occlusal est la cause de la malocclusion et, par conséquent, de la maladie du système masticatoire. (Figure 1a).  

But let's hear what the two players say, the dentist and the patient, in the informative dialogue.[[File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 1b:''' Motor evoked potential from electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots. Note the structural symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]

But let's hear what the two players say, the dentist and the patient, in the informative dialogue.[[File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 1b:''' Motor evoked potential from electrical transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal roots. Note the structural symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]