Changes

==Anomalie '' vs '' Interdisciplinarité==

==Anomalie '' vs '' Interdisciplinarité==

Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.

Compte tenu de ce qui précède, sur une vue superficielle de l'évolution épistémique de la Science, les deux aspects de disciplinarité ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", mettant en évidence l'anomalie) et Interdisciplinaire ("'' Engineering Paradigm of Science''" , échafaudage métacognitif), peuvent sembler être en conflit les uns avec les autres ; en réalité, cependant, comme nous allons juste le voir dans ce chapitre, ce sont les deux faces d'une même pièce car les deux ont tendance à générer une « innovation paradigmatique » sans aucun conflit.

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro  

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro