Editor, Editors, USER, editor, translator
5,845
edits
Changes
Created page with "Dans une étude récente, les auteurs se concentrent sur la question de savoir pourquoi les chercheurs ont des difficultés cognitives et épistémiques dans la conduite de l'..."
|-
|-
|
|
*'''Interdisciplinarité''': <br>En politique scientifique, il est généralement reconnu que ''la résolution de problèmes basée sur la science nécessite une recherche interdisciplinaire'' ('''IDR'''), comme proposé par le projet de l'UE appelé Horizon 2020<ref>European Union, ''[https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges Horizon 2020]''</ref>. In a recent study, the authors focus on the question why researchers have cognitive and epistemic difficulties in conducting IDR. It is believed that the loss of philosophical interest in the epistemology of interdisciplinary research is due to a philosophical paradigm of science called "Physics Paradigm of Science", which prevents recognition of important IDR changes in both the philosophy of science and research.<br>The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called "''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", makes alternative philosophical assumptions about aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called ''metacognitive scaffolds'' to assist them in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines.<br>In interdisciplinary research, metacognitive scaffolds help interdisciplinary communication analyse and articulate how the discipline builds knowledge<ref name=":0">
*'''Interdisciplinarité''': <br>En politique scientifique, il est généralement reconnu que ''la résolution de problèmes basée sur la science nécessite une recherche interdisciplinaire'' ('''IDR'''), comme proposé par le projet de l'UE appelé Horizon 2020<ref>European Union, ''[https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges Horizon 2020]''</ref>. Dans une étude récente, les auteurs se concentrent sur la question de savoir pourquoi les chercheurs ont des difficultés cognitives et épistémiques dans la conduite de l'IDR. On pense que la perte d'intérêt philosophique pour l'épistémologie de la recherche interdisciplinaire est due à un paradigme philosophique de la science appelé « paradigme physique de la science », qui empêche la reconnaissance d'importants changements IDR dans la philosophie des sciences et de la recherche.<br>The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called "''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", makes alternative philosophical assumptions about aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called ''metacognitive scaffolds'' to assist them in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines.<br>In interdisciplinary research, metacognitive scaffolds help interdisciplinary communication analyse and articulate how the discipline builds knowledge<ref name=":0">
{{cita libro
{{cita libro
| autore = Boon M
| autore = Boon M