Changes

==Anomalie ''vs.'' Interdisziplinarität==

==Anomalie ''vs.'' Interdisziplinarität==

Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.

Angesichts des oben Gesagten sind bei einer oberflächlichen Betrachtung der epistemischen Evolution der Wissenschaft die beiden Aspekte der Disziplinarität ("''Physical Paradigm of Science''", Hervorhebung der Anomalie) und Interdisziplinär ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''" , metakognitives Gerüst), scheinen in Konflikt miteinander zu stehen; in Wirklichkeit sind sie jedoch, wie wir gleich in diesem Kapitel sehen werden, zwei Seiten derselben Medaille, da beide dazu neigen, "paradigmatische Innovation" ohne jeglichen Konflikt hervorzubringen.

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro  

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro