Changes

==Anomalía ''vs'' interdisciplinariedad==

==Anomalía ''vs'' interdisciplinariedad==

Given the above, on a superficial view of the epistemic evolution of the Science, the two aspects of disciplinarity ("''Physics Paradigm of Science''", highlighting the anomaly) and Interdisciplinary ("''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", metacognitive scaffold), might seem to be in conflict with each other; in reality, however, as we are just going to see right in this chapter, they are two sides of the same coin because both tend to generate "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any conflict at all.

Dado lo anterior, en una visión superficial de la evolución epistémica de la Ciencia, los dos aspectos de la disciplinariedad ("'' Paradigma de la Física de la Ciencia ''", destacando la anomalía) e Interdisciplinar ("'' Paradigma de la Ingeniería de la Ciencia ''" , andamio metacognitivo), pueden parecer estar en conflicto entre sí; en realidad, sin embargo, como veremos en este capítulo, son dos caras de la misma moneda porque ambas tienden a generar "Innovación Paradigmática" sin ningún conflicto.

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro  

Now we could conclude that the "Innovations" are already "Progress of Science" in themselves, as stated in the article "''Scientific basis of dentistry''" by Yegane Guven, in which the effect of biological and digital revolutions is considered on dental education and daily clinical practice, such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information and stem cell studies.<ref>{{cita libro