Editor, Editors, USER, editor, translator
5,845
edits
Changes
Created page with "En un estudio reciente, los autores se centran en la cuestión de por qué los investigadores tienen dificultades cognitivas y epistémicas para realizar la IDR. Se cree que l..."
|-
|-
|
|
*'''Interdisciplinariedad''': <br>En política científica, generalmente se reconoce que "la resolución de problemas basada en la ciencia requiere investigación interdisciplinaria" ("IDR"), como propone el proyecto de la UE denominado Horizonte 2020<ref>European Union, ''[https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges Horizon 2020]''</ref>. In a recent study, the authors focus on the question why researchers have cognitive and epistemic difficulties in conducting IDR. It is believed that the loss of philosophical interest in the epistemology of interdisciplinary research is due to a philosophical paradigm of science called "Physics Paradigm of Science", which prevents recognition of important IDR changes in both the philosophy of science and research.<br>The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called "''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", makes alternative philosophical assumptions about aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called ''metacognitive scaffolds'' to assist them in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines.<br>In interdisciplinary research, metacognitive scaffolds help interdisciplinary communication analyse and articulate how the discipline builds knowledge<ref name=":0">
*'''Interdisciplinariedad''': <br>En política científica, generalmente se reconoce que "la resolución de problemas basada en la ciencia requiere investigación interdisciplinaria" ("IDR"), como propone el proyecto de la UE denominado Horizonte 2020<ref>European Union, ''[https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges Horizon 2020]''</ref>. En un estudio reciente, los autores se centran en la cuestión de por qué los investigadores tienen dificultades cognitivas y epistémicas para realizar la IDR. Se cree que la pérdida del interés filosófico en la epistemología de la investigación interdisciplinaria se debe a un paradigma filosófico de la ciencia llamado "Paradigma Físico de la Ciencia", que impide el reconocimiento de importantes cambios de IDR tanto en la filosofía de la ciencia como en la investigación.<br>The proposed alternative philosophical paradigm, called "''Engineering Paradigm of Science''", makes alternative philosophical assumptions about aspects such as the purpose of science, the character of knowledge, the epistemic and pragmatic criteria for the acceptance of knowledge and the role of technological tools. Consequently, scientific researchers need so-called ''metacognitive scaffolds'' to assist them in the analysis and reconstruction of how "knowledge" is constructed in different disciplines.<br>In interdisciplinary research, metacognitive scaffolds help interdisciplinary communication analyse and articulate how the discipline builds knowledge<ref name=":0">
{{cita libro
{{cita libro
| autore = Boon M
| autore = Boon M