Changes

Created page with "L'intuizione diagnostica di base è un modo di ragionamento rapido, non analitico e inconscio."
Line 510: Line 510:  
{{q4|Perché, allora, abbiamo un relativo successo nella diagnostica? |Ci vorrebbe un'enciclopedia a parte per rispondere a questo giustificato quesito ma senza andare troppo oltre proviamo a discuterne le motivazioni.}}
 
{{q4|Perché, allora, abbiamo un relativo successo nella diagnostica? |Ci vorrebbe un'enciclopedia a parte per rispondere a questo giustificato quesito ma senza andare troppo oltre proviamo a discuterne le motivazioni.}}
   −
Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  
+
L'intuizione diagnostica di base è un modo di ragionamento rapido, non analitico e inconscio. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  
 
  | autore = Vanstone M
 
  | autore = Vanstone M
 
  | autore2 = Monteiro S
 
  | autore2 = Monteiro S
Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,492

edits