Changes

After the previous chapters, we should now be able to recognize that, both in modern physics and in biology, a "Complex System" is a multi-component dynamic system composed of different subsystems that typically interact with each other. Such systems are typically studied through "holistic" investigation methodologies or as "total" computation of the behaviours of the individual subsystems, together with their mutual interactions; these can be described analytically through mathematical models, rather than, in a "reductionist" manner (i.e. by breaking down and analysing the system in its components). Typical of Complex Systems, are the concepts of self-organization and "Emerging Behaviour".  

After the previous chapters, we should now be able to recognize that, both in modern physics and in biology, a "Complex System" is a multi-component dynamic system composed of different subsystems that typically interact with each other. Such systems are typically studied through "holistic" investigation methodologies or as "total" computation of the behaviours of the individual subsystems, together with their mutual interactions; these can be described analytically through mathematical models, rather than, in a "reductionist" manner (i.e. by breaking down and analysing the system in its components). Typical of Complex Systems, are the concepts of self-organization and "Emerging Behaviour".  

In recent years, parallel developments in different disciplines have focused on what has been called "Connectivity"; a concept used to understand and describe the "Complex Systems". The conceptualizations and functionalisations of connectivity have evolved widely within their disciplinary boundaries, but there are clear similarities in this concept and in its application across the disciplines. However, any implementation of the concept of connectivity involves both ontological and epistemological constraints, which lead us to wonder if there is a type or set of connectivity approaches that could be applied to all disciplines. In this review, we explore four ontological and epistemological challenges in using connectivity to understand complex systems from the point of view of very different disciplines.  

In recent years, parallel developments in different disciplines have focused on what has been called "Connectivity"; a concept used to understand and describe the "Complex Systems". The conceptualizations and functionalisations of connectivity have evolved widely within their disciplinary boundaries, but there are clear similarities in this concept and in its application across the disciplines. However, any implementation of the concept of connectivity involves both ontological and epistemological constraints, which lead us to wonder if there is a type or set of connectivity approaches that could be applied to all disciplines. In this review, we explore four ontological and epistemological challenges in using connectivity to understand complex systems from the point of view of very different disciplines.  

In Chapter XX, we will introduce definitely the concept of:

In Chapter ' Connectivity and Complex Systems', we will introduce definitely the concept of:

#defining the fundamental unit for the study of connectivity;  

 

#separate structural connectivity from functional connectivity;  

#defining the fundamental unit for the study of connectivity;

#understanding of emerging behaviour; and  

#separate structural connectivity from functional connectivity;

#measuring connectivity.  

#understanding of emerging behaviour; and

#measuring connectivity.

 

Now we have to consider the complex profile of the masticatory function, to be able to talk about "connectivity"<ref>{{cita libro  

Now we have to consider the complex profile of the masticatory function, to be able to talk about "connectivity"<ref>{{cita libro  

  | autore = Turnbull L   

  | autore = Turnbull L   

To move more easily in this medical branch, a different scientific-clinical approach is required, one that widens the horizons of competence in fields such as bioengineering and neurobiology.  

To move more easily in this medical branch, a different scientific-clinical approach is required, one that widens the horizons of competence in fields such as bioengineering and neurobiology.  

It is, therefore, essential to focus attention on how to take trigeminal electrophysiological signals in response to a series of triggers evoked by an electrophysiological device, treating data and determining an organic-functional value of the trigeminal and masticatory systems.

It is, therefore, essential to focus attention on how to take trigeminal electrophysiological signals in response to a series of triggers evoked by an electrophysiological device, treating data and determining an organic-functional value of the trigeminal and masticatory systems as anticipated by Marom Bikson and coll. in their «''[[:File:Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.pdf|Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease]]''».

We should think of a system that unifies the mastication and neurophysiological functions by introducing a new term: "'''Neuro-Gnathological Functions'''" which will be object of a dedicated chapters.

We should think of a system that unifies the mastication and neurophysiological functions by introducing a new term: "'''Neuro-Gnathological Functions'''" which will be object of a dedicated chapters.

{{Bib}}

{{Bib}}

{{apm}}[[Category:Introduction]]

{{apm}}[[Category:Introduction]]

<onlyinclude> </onlyinclude>

<onlyinclude> </onlyinclude>

[[Category:Source Chapter]]

[[Category:Source Chapter]]