Changes

}}

}}

==Introduction==

==Introduction==

We parted ways in the previous chapter on the ‘Logic of Medical Language’ in an attempt to shift the attention from clinical symptom or sign to encrypted machine language for which, the arguments of Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos <ref>Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974509/?from_term=%22logic+of+diagnosis%22&from_pos=1 The Logic of Medical Diagnosis]. Spring 2013;56(2):300-15. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0019.</ref> and Pat Croskerry<ref>Pat Croskerry. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30033794/?from_term=%22Logic+classic%22&from_filter=simsearch3.fft&from_filter=pubt.review&from_pos=7 Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making]. . 2018 Aug;40(8):803-808. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898.Epub 2018 Jul 23</ref> are welcome but connected to time <math>t_n</math>  were welcome but connected to time, the bearer of information (anticipation of the symptom), and to the message (machine language and non-verbal language). Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science. We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder[[File:Question_2.jpg|link=https://it.masticationpedia.org/index.php/File:Question_2.jpg|left|150px]]{{q2|.... but could the logic of Classical Language help us to solve poor Mary Poppins' dilemma?|a bit of patience}}We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically valid, sensible questions and reflections and it is precisely for this reason that we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles.

We parted ways in the previous chapter on the ‘Logic of Medical Language’ in an attempt to shift the attention from clinical symptom or sign to encrypted machine language for which, the arguments of Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos <ref>Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974509/?from_term=%22logic+of+diagnosis%22&from_pos=1 The Logic of Medical Diagnosis]. Spring 2013;56(2):300-15. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0019.</ref> and Pat Croskerry<ref>Pat Croskerry. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30033794/?from_term=%22Logic+classic%22&from_filter=simsearch3.fft&from_filter=pubt.review&from_pos=7 Adaptive Expertise in Medical Decision Making]. . 2018 Aug;40(8):803-808. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898.Epub 2018 Jul 23</ref> are welcome but connected to time <math>t_n</math>  were welcome but connected to time, the bearer of information (anticipation of the symptom), and to the message (machine language and non-verbal language). Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science.  

 

We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder

{{q4|.... but could the logic of Classical Language help us to solve poor Mary Poppins' dilemma?|a bit of patience}}

We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically valid, sensible questions and reflections and it is precisely for this reason that we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles.

One of these fundamental topics is 'Craniofacial Biology'.

One of these fundamental topics is 'Craniofacial Biology'.

</gallery>

</gallery>

----[[File:Question_2.jpg|link=https://it.masticationpedia.org/index.php/File:Question_2.jpg|left|150px]]{{q2|Let me better understand what Classical Language Logic has to do with it|We will do it following the clinical case of our Mary Poppins}}

----[[File:Question_2.jpg|link=https://it.masticationpedia.org/index.php/File:Question_2.jpg|left|150px]]{{q2|Let me better understand what Classical Language Logic has to do with it|We will do it following the clinical case of our Mary Poppins}}

==Mathematical formalism==

==Mathematical formalism==

In this chapter we will reconsider the clinical case of the unfortunate Mary Poppins suffering from Orofacial Pain for more than 10 years to which her dentist diagnosed as Temporomandibular Disorders or rather Orofacial Pain from Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). To better understand why the exact diagnostic formulation remains complex with a Logic of Classical Language, we should understand the concept on which the philosophy of classical language is based with a brief introduction to the topic.

In this chapter we will reconsider the clinical case of the unfortunate Mary Poppins suffering from Orofacial Pain for more than 10 years to which her dentist diagnosed as Temporomandibular Disorders or rather Orofacial Pain from Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). To better understand why the exact diagnostic formulation remains complex with a Logic of Classical Language, we should understand the concept on which the philosophy of classical language is based with a brief introduction to the topic.