Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,492
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Now, assuming that the machine language and the assembler code are well structured, we insert the encrypted message from the Mary Poppins System in the ‘[[:wikipedia:Bocca_della_Verità|Mouth of truth]]’:
Now, assuming that the machine language and the assembler code are well structured, we insert the encrypted message from the Mary Poppins System in the ‘[[:wikipedia:Bocca_della_Verità|Mouth of truth]]’:
<math>0HLKjM2oMw/u0LB4s6AI4w== </math>
<math>133755457655037A </math>
<br />
<br />Let's pretend that we are Martians in possession of the right key (algorithm or context) the Akey that corresponds to the 'Real Context'. We would be able to perfectly decrypt the message, as you can verify by entering the code in the appropriate window:
Let's pretend that we are Martians in possession of the right key (algorithm or context) ‘key (<code>aes-128-cbc</code>)’ that corresponds to the 'real context'. We would be able to perfectly decrypt the message, as you can verify by entering the code in the appropriate window:
{{q2|Ephaptic|}}
{{q2|Ephaptic|}}
But, luckily or not, we are not Martians, so we will use, contextually to the information acquired from the social and scientific context, the dental key (aes-128-cfb), with the consequent decryption of the message into:
But, luckily or not, we are not Martians, so we will use, contextually to the information acquired from the social and scientific context, the dental key that correspond to B key, with the consequent decryption of the message into:
{{q2|���X""�4f�J!y�#�|}}
{{q2|5GoI49E5!|}}
Using the key (aes-128-cfb1), that corresponds to the neurological context, the decryption of the message would be:
Using the C key that corresponds to the neurological context, the decryption of the message would be:
{{q2|���N��2��SHر)�|}}
{{q2|26k81n_g+|}}
This means that medical language logics mainly built on an extension of verbal language, are not very efficient in being quick and detailed in diagnostics; especially the differential one. This is because the distortion due to the ambiguity and semantic vagueness of the linguistic expression, called ‘vagueness epistemic’ or ‘epistemic uncertainty’, or better ‘uncertain knowledge’, forcibly directs the diagnosis towards the '''specialist reference context''' and not on the exact and real one.
These are extraordinarily interesting elements of language logic, and please note that the encrypted message of the real context ‘meaning’ of the ‘disease’, the A key, is totally different from the one encrypted through the B keys and the C key: they are constructed in conventionally different contexts, while there is only one reality and this indicates a hypothetical '''diagnostic error'''.
This means that medical language logics mainly built on an extension of verbal language, are not very efficient in being quick and detailed in diagnostics, especially the differential one. This is because the distortion due to the ambiguity and semantic vagueness of the linguistic expression, called ‘vagueness epistemic’ or ‘epistemic uncertainty’, or better ‘uncertain knowledge’, forcibly directs the diagnosis towards the '''specialist reference context''' and not on the exact and real one.
[[File:Question_2.jpg|link=https://it.masticationpedia.org/index.php/File:Question_2.jpg|left|86x86px]]
[[File:Question_2.jpg|link=https://it.masticationpedia.org/index.php/File:Question_2.jpg|left|86x86px]]