Changes

|}

|}

Now the conclusion remains very critical because we might be finding ourselves in front of a verbal language of the patient which is misleading because it is not specific and does not respond to a detailed physiopathogenetic knowledge of the occlusal state; or, paradoxically, we are otherwise facing a machine language converted into verbal language which guarantees the integrity of the system. At this point the situation is truly embarrassing because neither the patient nor the observer (dentist) will be able to say with certainty that the System is in a “Malocclusion” state.

Teraz wniosek pozostaje bardzo krytyczny, ponieważ możemy napotkać język werbalny pacjenta, który jest mylący, ponieważ nie jest specyficzny i nie odpowiada szczegółowej fizjopatogenetycznej wiedzy o stanie zgryzu; lub, paradoksalnie, mamy do czynienia z językiem maszynowym przekształconym na język werbalny, który gwarantuje integralność systemu. W tym momencie sytuacja jest naprawdę zawstydzająca, ponieważ ani pacjent, ani obserwator (dentysta) nie będą mogli z całą pewnością stwierdzić, że System jest w stanie „wady zgryzu”.

[[File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|alt=|left|thumb|'''Postać 1c:''' Mandibular reflex evoked by percussion of the chin through a triggered neurological hammer. <br>Note the functional symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]

[[File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|alt=|left|thumb|'''Postać 1c:''' Mandibular reflex evoked by percussion of the chin through a triggered neurological hammer. <br>Note the functional symmetry calculated by the peak-to-peak amplitude on the right and left masseters.]]

It is precisely at this moment that one remembers the criticism of the American Statistician Association titled “''Statistical inference in the 21st century: A World Beyond p <0.05''”, which urges the researcher to accept uncertainty, be sensible reflective, open and modest in his statements<ref name="wasser" />: which basically translates into a search for interdisciplinarity.

It is precisely at this moment that one remembers the criticism of the American Statistician Association titled “''Statistical inference in the 21st century: A World Beyond p <0.05''”, which urges the researcher to accept uncertainty, be sensible reflective, open and modest in his statements<ref name="wasser" />: which basically translates into a search for interdisciplinarity.