Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,492
edits
Changes
no edit summary
<math>\urcorner\{a \not\in x \mid \forall \text{x} \; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \and A( a)\rightarrow \urcorner B(a) \}</math>. <math>(4)</math>
<math>\urcorner\{a \not\in x \mid \forall \text{x} \; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \and A( a)\rightarrow \urcorner B(a) \}</math>. <math>(4)</math>
Following the logical rules of predicates, there is no reason to say that denial (4) is contradictory or meaningless and therefore the neurologist (unlike the dentist) would not seem to have the logical tools to confirm his conclusion.{{Rosso Fine}}
Following the logical rules of predicates, there is no reason to say that denial (4) is contradictory or meaningless and therefore the neurologist (unlike the dentist) would not seem to have the logical tools to confirm his conclusion.
[[File:Question 2.jpg|sinistra|100x100px]]{{q2|then the dentist triumphs!|it's not for sure}}
[[File:Question 2.jpg|sinistra|100x100px]]{{q2|then the dentist triumphs!|it's not for sure}}