Changes

<translate>This statement is so true that the</translate> <math><translate>P-value</translate></math> <translate>could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an</translate> <math>\alpha=0</math> <translate>that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance</translate>.

<translate>This statement is so true that the</translate> <math><translate>P-value</translate></math> <translate>could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an</translate> <math>\alpha=0</math> <translate>that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance</translate>.

==Final considerations==

==<translate>Final considerations</translate>==

Saying from the perspective of observation of this type, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u> is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math>which give the dentist the complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD or she has not.

<translate>From a perspective of observation of this kind, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the</translate> <u><translate>principle of the excluded third</translate></u>: <translate>the principle is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions</translate> <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> <translate>which grant the dentist a complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence</translate> <math>\Im</math>: <translate>Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD, or she has not</translate>.

{{q4|....and if with the advancement of research new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right instead of the dentist?|}}

{{q4|...<translate>and what if, with the advancement of research, new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right, instead of the dentist?</translate>|}}

Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> in coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions <math>(\gamma_1,\gamma_2,.....\gamma_n \ )</math> were shown to be coherent which would make a different sentence compatible <math>\Im</math> like: could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder (_nOP) and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders?

<translate>Basically, given the compatibility of the assertions</translate> <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math>, <translate>coherently saying that Orofacial Pain is caused by a Temporomandibular Disorders could become incompatible if another series of assertions</translate> <math>(\gamma_1,\gamma_2,.....\gamma_n \ )</math> <translate>were shown to be coherent</translate>: <translate>this would make a different sentence compatible</translate> <math>\Im</math>: <translate>could poor Mary Poppins suffer from Orofacial Pain from a neuromotor disorder</translate> (_nOP) <translate>and not by a Temporomandibular Disorders</translate>?

In the current medical language logic such assertions remain only assertions because the convictions and opinions do not allow a consequent and quick change of the mindset.

<translate>In the current medical language logic, such assertions only remain assertions, because the convictions and opinions do not allow a consequent and quick change of the mindset</translate>.

Also, taking into account also the risk that this change entails, in fact, if we consider a recent article on the epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders in which the authors<ref>{{cite book  

<translate>Moreover, taking into account the risk that this change entails, in fact, we might consider a recent article on the epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders</translate><ref>{{cite book  

  | autore = LeResche L

  | autore = LeResche L

  | titolo = Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors

  | titolo = Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors

  | DOI = 10.1177/10454411970080030401

  | DOI = 10.1177/10454411970080030401

  | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->

  | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->

  }}</ref> confirm that despite the methodological and population differences, pain in the temporomandibular region appears to be relatively common, occurring in about the 10% of the population we may be led to hypothesize objectively that our Mary Poppins can be included in the 10% of the patients mentioned in the epidemiological study and be contextually classified as a patient suffering from Orofacial Pain from Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)

  }}</ref> <translate>in which the authors confirm that despite the methodological and population differences, pain in the temporomandibular region appears to be relatively common, occurring in about the 10% of the population</translate>; <translate>we may then objectively be led to hypothesize that our Mary Poppins can be included in the 10% of the patients mentioned in the epidemiological study, and contextually be classified as a patient suffering from Orofacial Pain from Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)</translate>.

In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either it is white or it is black), cannot depict the many shades that occur in real clinical situations.

<translate>In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either it is white or it is black), cannot depict the many shades that occur in real clinical situations</translate>.

We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic ...

<translate>We need to find a more convenient and suitable language logic</translate>...

{{q4|... then can we think of a Probabilistic Language Logic?|perhaps}}

{{q4|... <translate>can we then think of a Probabilistic Language Logic?</translate>|<translate>perhaps</translate>}}

{{Btnav|The logic of medical language|The logic of probabilistic language}}

{{Btnav|The logic of medical language|The logic of probabilistic language}}