Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, push-subscription-manager, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, widgeteditor
17,894
edits
Changes
→Compatibility and incompatibility of the statements
}}</ref> <translate>These scientific references determine the compatibility of the assertion</translate>.
}}</ref> <translate>These scientific references determine the compatibility of the assertion</translate>.
<math>\delta_2=</math> '''Sensitivity and specificity of the axiographic measurement:''' A study conducted to verify the sensitivity and specificity of the data collected from a group of patients affected by temporomandibular joint disorders with an ARCUSdigma axiographic system ([https://www.kavo.com/de-de/ KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach / Ris]) confirmed a sensitivity of the 84.21% and 92.86% sensitivity for the right and left TMJs respectively and a specificity of 93.75% and 95.65%.<ref>{{cite book
<math>\delta_2=</math> '''<translate>Sensitivity and specificity of the axiographic measurement</translate>:''' <translate>A study was conducted to verify the sensitivity and specificity of the data collected from a group of patients affected by temporomandibular joint disorders with an ARCUSdigma axiographic system</translate><ref>[https://www.kavo.com/de-de/ KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach / Ris]</ref>; <translate>it confirmed a sensitivity of the 84.21% and a 92.86% sensitivity for the right and left TMJs respectively, and a specificity of 93.75% and 95.65%</translate>.<ref>{{cite book
| autore = Kobs G
| autore = Kobs G
| autore2 = Didziulyte A
| autore2 = Didziulyte A
| DOI =
| DOI =
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
}}</ref> These scientific references determine compatibility of the assertion in the dental context precisely because of the consistency of related studies.<ref>{{cite book
}}</ref> <translate>These scientific references determine compatibility of the assertion in the dental context precisely because of the consistency of related studies</translate>.<ref>{{cite book
| autore = Piancino MG
| autore = Piancino MG
| autore2 = Roberi L
| autore2 = Roberi L
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
<math>\delta_3=</math> '''Alteration of condylar paths:''' Urbano Santana-Mora and coll.<ref>{{cite book
<math>\delta_3=</math> '''<translate>Alteration of condylar paths</translate>:''' Urbano Santana-Mora <translate>and</translate> coll.<ref>{{cite book
| autore = López-Cedrún J
| autore = López-Cedrún J
| autore2 = Santana-Mora U
| autore2 = Santana-Mora U
| DOI = 10.1038/sdata.2017.168
| DOI = 10.1038/sdata.2017.168
| oaf = YES<!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| oaf = YES<!-- qualsiasi valore -->
}}</ref> evaluated 24 adult patients suffering from severe chronic unilateral pain diagnosed as Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). The following functional and dynamic factors were evaluated: (1) masticatory function; (2) remodelling of the TMJ or condylar pathway (CP); and (3) lateral movement of the jaw or lateral guide (LG). The CPs were assessed using conventional axiography and LG was assessed by using kinesiograph tracing ([https://www.myotronics.com/ Myotronics Inc., Kent, WA, US]) Seventeen (71%) of the 24 (100%) patients consistently showed a side of habitual chewing side. The mean and standard deviation of the CP angles was 47.90 <math>\pm</math> 9.24) degrees. The average of LG angles was 42.95<math>\pm</math>11.78 degrees. Data collection emerged from the conception of a new TMD paradigm in which the affected side could be the usual chewing side, the side where the mandibular lateral kinematic angle was flatter. This parameter may also be compatible with the dental claim.
}}</ref> <translate>evaluated 24 adult patients suffering from severe chronic unilateral pain diagnosed as Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). The following functional and dynamic factors were evaluated</translate>: *masticatory function;
*remodelling of the TMJ or condylar pathway (CP); and
*lateral movement of the jaw or lateral guide (LG).
The CPs were assessed using conventional axiography and LG was assessed by using kinesiograph tracing ([https://www.myotronics.com/ Myotronics Inc., Kent, WA, US]) Seventeen (71%) of the 24 (100%) patients consistently showed a side of habitual chewing side. The mean and standard deviation of the CP angles was 47.90 <math>\pm</math> 9.24) degrees. The average of LG angles was 42.95<math>\pm</math>11.78 degrees. Data collection emerged from the conception of a new TMD paradigm in which the affected side could be the usual chewing side, the side where the mandibular lateral kinematic angle was flatter. This parameter may also be compatible with the dental claim.
<math>\delta_4=</math> '''EMG Intereference pattern:''' M.O. Mazzetto and coll.<ref>{{cite book
<math>\delta_4=</math> '''EMG Intereference pattern:''' M.O. Mazzetto and coll.<ref>{{cite book