Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, push-subscription-manager, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, widgeteditor
17,894
edits
Changes
→Could articles be rejected?
=== Could articles be rejected? ===
=== Could articles be rejected? ===
{{Rosso inizio}}No. [[Masticationpedia]] is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance/reject decision by the referees, for a number of reasons some of which are recalled in our [[welcome]]. {{Rosso Fine}}
{{Rosso inizio}}No. [[Masticationpedia]] is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance/reject decision by some referees, for a number of reasons some of which are recalled in our [[welcome]]. {{Rosso Fine}}
Please note that this does not mean that anyone can write and write anything here, whatever his/her fantasy might suggest him/her: on the contrary our philosophy is to give wide unlimited space, without constraints, to scientists without subjecting them to an interrogation of 'verifiability' by referees. A scientist or a researcher must not submit his/her work to the judgment of a group of 'experts', because otherwise the genius of the scientist would remain hidden in his/her existence as it has already happened several times. We prefer to apply an upstream filter, instead: to let a proponent author enter as an [[Masticationpedia:Editor|editor]], the [[Masticationpedia:Scientific Community|Scientific Community]] of Masticationpedia must deepen the analysis of his/her competences and know-how, and when suitable for the implementation of the platform, it will flag him/her as an 'Editor'.
Please note that this does not mean that anyone can write and write anything here, whatever his/her fantasy might suggest him/her: on the contrary our philosophy is to give wide unlimited space, without constraints, to scientists without subjecting them to an interrogation of 'verifiability' by referees. A scientist or a researcher must not submit his/her work to the judgment of a group of 'experts', because otherwise the genius of the scientist would remain hidden in his/her existence as it has already happened several times. We prefer to apply an upstream filter, instead: to let a proponent author enter as an [[Masticationpedia:Editor|editor]], the [[Masticationpedia:Scientific Community|Scientific Community]] of Masticationpedia must deepen the analysis of his/her competences and know-how, and when suitable for the implementation of the platform, it will flag him/her as an 'Editor'.