Changes

{{Rosso inizio}}No. [[Masticationpedia]] is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance or reject decision by the referees, for a number of reasons some of which are recalled in our  [[welcome]]. {{Rosso Fine}}

{{Rosso inizio}}No. [[Masticationpedia]] is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance or reject decision by the referees, for a number of reasons some of which are recalled in our  [[welcome]]. {{Rosso Fine}}

Please note that this does not mean that anyone can write and write anything here, whatever his/her fantasy might suggest him/her: on the contrary our philosophy is to give wide unlimited space, without constraints, to scientists without subjecting them to an interrogation of 'verifiability' by referees. A scientist or a researcher must not submit to the judgment of a group of 'experts', because otherwise the genius of the scientist would remain hidden in his existence as it has already happened several times. We prefer to apply an upstream filter, instead: to let a proponent author enter as an [[Masticationpedia:Editor|editor]], the [[Masticationpedia:Scientific Community|Scientific Community]] of Masticationpedia must deepen the analysis of his/her competences and know-how, and when suitable for the implementation of the platform, it will flah him/her as an 'Editor'.  

Please note that this does not mean that anyone can write and write anything here, whatever his/her fantasy might suggest him/her: on the contrary our philosophy is to give wide unlimited space, without constraints, to scientists without subjecting them to an interrogation of 'verifiability' by referees. A scientist or a researcher must not submit his/her work to the judgment of a group of 'experts', because otherwise the genius of the scientist would remain hidden in his/her existence as it has already happened several times. We prefer to apply an upstream filter, instead: to let a proponent author enter as an [[Masticationpedia:Editor|editor]], the [[Masticationpedia:Scientific Community|Scientific Community]] of Masticationpedia must deepen the analysis of his/her competences and know-how, and when suitable for the implementation of the platform, it will flah him/her as an 'Editor'.  

From this point on, the responsibility for what an editor writes, for better or for worse, lies solely with him. Masticationpedia as a whole is basically a scientific laboratory, in which ideas are not ''contained'' but ''appreciated''. This model is innovative, as well as democratic and liberal, and it ennobles the Man of Science and it weakens the 'referees commissions'  

From this point on, the responsibility for what an editor writes, for better or for worse, lies solely with him. Masticationpedia as a whole is basically a scientific laboratory, in which ideas are not ''contained'' but ''appreciated''. This model is innovative, as well as democratic and liberal, and it ennobles the Man of Science and it weakens the 'referees commissions'