Changes

=== Can the chapters not be accepted? ===

=== Can the chapters not be accepted? ===

<nowiki>===</nowiki>{{Rosso inizio}}No. Masticationpedia is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance or reject decision by the referees for a number of reasons that we have reported in the welcome letters.

{{Rosso inizio}}No. [[Masticationpedia]] is coherent with its strategies. One of these is the elimination of the acceptance or reject decision by the referees, for a number of reasons some of which are recalled in our  [[welcome]].

This does not mean that everyone can write and write everything, on the contrary our philosophy is to give ample space without limits to scientists without subjecting them to an interrogation of 'verifiability' by referees. A scientist or a researcher must not submit to the judgment of a group of 'experts' because otherwise the genius of the scientist would remain hidden in his existence as has already happened several times. We prefer to do the filter upstream, in the sense that to enter as editor, the Scientific Committee of Masticationpedia must deepen the analysis of the competences and know-how of the proponent author and once considered suitable for the implementation of the platform, it will consider him as 'Editor'. From this point on, the responsibility for what the hypothetical editor writes, for better or for worse, lies solely with him. Masticationpedia is basically a scientific laboratory in which ideas are not contained but are appreciated. This model is innovative and democratic and liberal, it ennobles the man of Science and it weakens the 'referees commissions'  {{Rosso Fine}}===

When our reviewers conclude that the proposed works are not [yet] ready for publishing, nothing happens to the related existing articles, the proposal will instead be kept as a draft for further development.

From this point on, the responsibility for what an editor writes, for better or for worse, lies solely with him. Masticationpedia as a whole is basically a scientific laboratory, in which ideas are not ''contained'' but ''appreciated''. This model is innovative, as well as democratic and liberal, and it ennobles the Man of Science and it weakens the 'referees commissions'  {{Rosso Fine}}

[[Category:Help]]

[[Category:Help]]

[[Category:Lab]]

[[Category:Lab]]