Changes

[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250x250px]]

[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250x250px]]

In questo capitolo, discuteremo la logica del linguaggio accoppiata con la probabilità matematica. Abbiamo visto che [[The logic of classical language|logica classica]] da sola non è sufficiente per determinare diagnosi accurate; hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.  

In questo capitolo, discuteremo la logica del linguaggio accoppiata con la probabilità matematica. Abbiamo visto che [[The logic of classical language|logica classica]] da sola non è sufficiente per determinare diagnosi accurate; quindi, viene fornita una panoramica concettuale e formale sul perché la probabilità può essere molto utile. Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.  

The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.  

The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.