Changes

== Neutralidad de contenido ==

== Neutralidad de contenido ==

Si bien uno de los valores más valiosos aportados por Wikipedia al conocimiento es el reporte neutral de información<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

Si bien uno de los valores más valiosos aportados por Wikipedia al conocimiento es el reporte neutral de información<ref>[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]</ref>, en el que los datos se muestran sin avalarlos ni rechazarlos, atribuyendo (y por tanto redireccionando) las valoraciones relativas a las fuentes, en Masticationpedia sería sumamente difícil afirmar que hay posibilidades de permanecer neutrales en la presentación de contenidos que nacen en el corazón de la investigación científica: Masticationpedia tiene como finalidad la producción de nuevos contenidos, [todavía] no historizados en visiones generalistas, y podría más bien, por su propia naturaleza, favorecer la proposición de innovaciones que, como tales, no tienen por qué ser neutrales (ni podría ser), pero ortodoxas según el método científico<ref>[[:wikipedia:Scientific method|Scientific method]]</ref>, which is a completely different matter.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.

The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.