Changes

  }}</ref>

  }}</ref>

<translate>Townsend and Brook's extraordinary work too deserves a mention</translate><ref name=":0" /> <translate>, and the intrinsic content of what has been reported in it matches equally well with another commendable author: HC Slavkin</translate>.<ref>{{Cite book  

<translate>Townsend and Brook's extraordinary work too deserves a mention</translate><ref name=":0" />,  <translate>and the intrinsic content of what has been reported in it matches equally well with another commendable author: HC Slavkin</translate>.<ref>{{Cite book  

  | autore = Slavkin HC

  | autore = Slavkin HC

  | titolo = The Future of Research in Craniofacial Biology and What This Will Mean for Oral Health Professional Education and Clinical Practice

  | titolo = The Future of Research in Craniofacial Biology and What This Will Mean for Oral Health Professional Education and Clinical Practice

|DOI=10.1111/adj.12475

|DOI=10.1111/adj.12475

|OCLC=

|OCLC=

}}</ref> The crossbite is another disturbing element of the normal occlusion<ref>{{cita libro

}}</ref> <translate>The crossbite is another disturbing element of the normal occlusion</translate><ref>{{cita libro

|autore=Miamoto CB

|autore=Miamoto CB

|autore2=Silva Marques L

|autore2=Silva Marques L

|DOI=

|DOI=

|OCLC=

|OCLC=

}}</ref> for which it is compulsorily treated together with the openbite.<ref>{{cita libro

}}</ref> <translate>for which it is compulsorily treated together with the openbite</translate>.<ref>{{cita libro

|autore=Alachioti XS

|autore=Alachioti XS

|autore2=Dimopoulou E

|autore2=Dimopoulou E

|DOI=10.1179/bjo.5.1.21

|DOI=10.1179/bjo.5.1.21

|OCLC=

|OCLC=

}}</ref> This type of reasoning means that the model (masticatory system) is 'normalized to occlusion', and read in reverse, it means that the occlusal discrepancy it is the cause of malocclusion, hence, a disease of the Masticatory System and therefore an intervention to restore the physiological masticatory function is justifiable. (Figure 1a).

}}</ref> <translate>This type of reasoning means that the model (masticatory system) is 'normalized to occlusion'; and read in reverse, it means that the occlusal discrepancy is the cause of malocclusion, hence, a disease of the Masticatory System, and therefore an intervention to restore the physiological masticatory function is justifiable</translate>. (<translate>Figure</translate> 1a).

This example is Classical Logic Language, as we are going to explain in detail, but now a doubt arises:

<translate>This example is Classical Logic Language, as we are going to explain in detail, but now a doubt arises</translate>:

'At the time when orthodontic and orthognathics axioms were constructing protocols confirmed by the International Scientific Community, were they aware of the information we discussed in the introduction to this chapter?

:<translate>At the time when orthodontic and orthognathics axioms were constructing protocols confirmed by the International Scientific Community, were they aware of the information we discussed in the introduction to this chapter?</translate>

Certainly not! because time '''<math>t_n</math>''' '''is the bearer of information''' but despite this cognitive limit we proceeded with a very questionable Classical Language Logic for the safety of the citizen.

<translate>Certainly not because time '''<math>t_n</math> is the bearer of information''' but despite this cognitive limit we proceed with a very questionable Classical Language Logic for the safety of the citizen</translate>.

{{q2|..... this statement seems a bit risky!|sure, but the logical sequence has already been anticipated}}

{{q2|... <translate>this statement seems a bit risky</translate>!|<translate>sure, but the logical sequence has already been anticipated</translate>}}

If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic' (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter) the conclusions would be surprising.

<translate>If the same case were interpreted with a mindset that followed a 'System's language logic' (it will be discussed in the appropriate chapter), the conclusions would be surprising</translate>.

If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion), we shall notice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void.  

<translate>If we observe the electrophysiological responses performed on the patient with malocclusion in figures 1b, 1c and 1d (with the explanation made directly in the caption to simplify the discussion), we shall notice that these data can make us think about anything except a 'Malocclusion' and, therefore, the axioms of type orthodontic and orthognathics 'cause/effect' leave a conceptual void</translate>.  

<gallery mode="packed-hover" widths="250" heights="182" perrow="3">

<gallery mode="packed-hover" widths="250" heights="182" perrow="3">