Changes

Created page with "Hemos visto que lógica clásica por sí sola es insuficiente para determinar diagnósticos precisos"
Line 4: Line 4:     
[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250x250px]]
 
[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250x250px]]
En este capítulo, discutiremos la lógica del lenguaje junto con la probabilidad matemática.. We have seen that [[The logic of classical language|classical logic]] alone is insufficient to determine accurate diagnoses; hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.  
+
En este capítulo, discutiremos la lógica del lenguaje junto con la probabilidad matemática.. Hemos visto que [[The logic of classical language|lógica clásica]] por sí sola es insuficiente para determinar diagnósticos precisos; hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.  
    
The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.  
 
The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.  
Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, push-subscription-manager, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, widgeteditor
17,894

edits