Changes

Ciò significa che le logiche di linguaggio mediche costruite principalmente su un'estensione del linguaggio verbale sono poco efficienti nell'essere rapidi e dettagliati nella diagnostica specialmente quella differenziale perché la distorsione dovuta all’ambiguità ed alla vaghezza semantica dell'espressione linguistica, chiamata "Vaghezza Epistemica" o "Incertezza epistemica" o meglio ancora "Conoscenza incerta" indirizza forzatamente la diagnosi verso il contesto di riferimento specialistico e non su quello esatto e reale.  

Ciò significa che le logiche di linguaggio mediche costruite principalmente su un'estensione del linguaggio verbale sono poco efficienti nell'essere rapidi e dettagliati nella diagnostica specialmente quella differenziale perché la distorsione dovuta all’ambiguità ed alla vaghezza semantica dell'espressione linguistica, chiamata "Vaghezza Epistemica" o "Incertezza epistemica" o meglio ancora "Conoscenza incerta" indirizza forzatamente la diagnosi verso il contesto di riferimento specialistico e non su quello esatto e reale.  

{{q4|Why, then, are we relatively successful in diagnostics? |An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

{{q4|Perché, allora, abbiamo un relativo successo nella diagnostica? |An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book