Difference between revisions of "Masticationpedia:Differences from other collaborative projects/es"
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Por supuesto, la experiencia de los proyectos colaborativos, ciertamente en primer lugar Wikipedia, es en sí misma un dato fenomenológicamente muy importante, del que tenemo...") |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) (Created page with "De hecho") |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Brainstorming session.jpg|right|350px]] | [[File:Brainstorming session.jpg|right|350px]] | ||
| − | Por supuesto, la experiencia de los proyectos colaborativos, ciertamente en primer lugar Wikipedia, es en sí misma un dato fenomenológicamente muy importante, del que tenemos una noción plena (y agradecida): en esa enciclopedia estaba la posibilidad de interacción incondicional con el Proyecto lo que lo hizo (en tan relativamente poco tiempo) el fenómeno de éxito editorial que conocemos, así como un punto de no retorno para la evolución gnoseológica). Lo sabemos, lo tenemos muy claro en mente. | + | Por supuesto, la experiencia de los proyectos colaborativos, ciertamente en primer lugar Wikipedia, es en sí misma un dato fenomenológicamente muy importante, del que tenemos una noción plena (y agradecida): en esa enciclopedia estaba la posibilidad de interacción incondicional con el Proyecto lo que lo hizo (en tan relativamente poco tiempo) el fenómeno de éxito editorial que conocemos, así como un punto de no retorno para la evolución gnoseológica). Lo sabemos, lo tenemos muy claro en mente. De hecho, '''anyone can access and edit the discussion pages of any page published on Masticationpedia'''. Anyone can tell us that "the King is naked", if appropriate, and anyone can offer his studies as long as they are reasonably compatible with the purposes of the site and presented in the appropriate ways. In the discussion pages ("talk pages"), which are in fact open. Only registration and confirmation of the reference e-mail are required. |
The content pages, instead, are reserved for authors, and cannot be edited "on the fly". They could be modified, they are not carved on stone, but the changes would be checked before publication, as if they were new pages. | The content pages, instead, are reserved for authors, and cannot be edited "on the fly". They could be modified, they are not carved on stone, but the changes would be checked before publication, as if they were new pages. | ||
Revision as of 01:33, 27 January 2021
Masticationpedia usa MediaWiki[1], un software creado para el más importante de los proyectos colaborativos en línea para la creación y distribución de contenido, Wikipedia[2]. Wikipedia y otras wikis han entrado ahora en nuestra vida cotidiana, son (afortunadamente) herramientas con las que todos estamos familiarizados hoy. Pero hay varias diferencias entre Masticationpedia y los otros wikis, diferencias sensibles en las que vale la pena detenerse antes de comenzar la interacción con esta plataforma.
Creación de contenido
La diferencia más importante es ciertamente que En Masticationpedia no todos pueden escribir.. La edición en Masticationpedia no está abierta a ningún transeúnte.
Masticationpedia produce contenidos científicos especializados, estos contenidos son analizados por nuestra comunidad científica y la calidad experiencial de la fuente marca la diferencia, como lo hace en todo el sistema de producción de conocimiento profesional especializado.
Por supuesto, la experiencia de los proyectos colaborativos, ciertamente en primer lugar Wikipedia, es en sí misma un dato fenomenológicamente muy importante, del que tenemos una noción plena (y agradecida): en esa enciclopedia estaba la posibilidad de interacción incondicional con el Proyecto lo que lo hizo (en tan relativamente poco tiempo) el fenómeno de éxito editorial que conocemos, así como un punto de no retorno para la evolución gnoseológica). Lo sabemos, lo tenemos muy claro en mente. De hecho, anyone can access and edit the discussion pages of any page published on Masticationpedia. Anyone can tell us that "the King is naked", if appropriate, and anyone can offer his studies as long as they are reasonably compatible with the purposes of the site and presented in the appropriate ways. In the discussion pages ("talk pages"), which are in fact open. Only registration and confirmation of the reference e-mail are required.
The content pages, instead, are reserved for authors, and cannot be edited "on the fly". They could be modified, they are not carved on stone, but the changes would be checked before publication, as if they were new pages.
If you are a Professional or a scholar, if you have a pertinent competence and wish to collaborate in the construction of new knowledge in the sectors of our interest, please contact us: Masticationpedia wishes to interact with anyone bringing us scientific concepts to share, and hopes to be able to increase knowledge through this very special path.
Content neutrality
While one of the most precious values brought by Wikipedia to knowledge is the neutral reporting of information[3], in which the data are shown without endorsing or rejecting them, attributing (and therefore redirecting) the relative assessments to the sources, in Masticationpedia it would be extremely difficult to affirm that there are possibilities to remain neutral in presenting content that is born in the heart of scientific research: Masticationpedia has for its own purpose the production of new content, not [yet] historicized in generalist visions, and could rather, by its very nature, favour the proposition of innovations which, as such, do not have to be neutral (nor could be), but orthodox according to the scientific method[4], which is a completely different matter.
The contents of Masticationpedia therefore contain appraisals and valuations, and apparently comments and opinions too, and it is perfectly normal (here) that it is so. We are not reporting the general outcome of our Discipline, we are interacting with it, on it. For it, of course.
Effects of communitarian consensus
All collaborative projects live on the liveliness of the communities that develop in them. Masticationpedia is no exception: here too there is a (still small) community of contributors discussing the project choices. However, since the scientific method is the only beacon that must guide us, in Masticationpedia the Community does not have the sovereign powers it can have elsewhere, and if one day the Community decided for instance to make the Project state that the Earth is flat, that consensus would be incinerated by the scientific method, by which that hypothesis proves wrong.
The Community cannot intervene on the contents except in the sense of verification, control, refinement, improvement, growth (and removal of any errors, of course), according to the scientific method.
At least in the start-up phase, the Community has no competence at all on the management of users, whose assessment is up to the Masticationpedia Charity, by now exclusively, as the faculty to interrupt its activity is, as well, for many legal and technical reasons. Masticationpedia is a private site, the possibilities for collaborative access offered to the public are limited by reasonable utility requirements in the sole perspective of the pursuit of the constitutive purposes, excluding any and all other and different purposes.
Masticationpedia respeta el derecho a la expresión y la libertad de palabra, pero este sitio tiene un propósito muy específico y no es permitir espacios dialécticos, sino construir conocimiento científico especializado.
Note
particularly focusing on the field of the neurophysiology of the masticatory system
it:Masticationpedia:Differenze rispetto ad altri Progetti collaborativi