Changes

<translate>The CPs were assessed using conventional axiography and LG was assessed by using kinesiograph tracing</translate><ref>[https://www.myotronics.com/ Myotronics Inc., Kent, WA, US]</ref>; <translate>Seventeen (71%) of the 24 (100%) patients consistently showed a side of habitual chewing side. The mean and standard deviation of the CP angles was 47.90</translate> <math>\pm</math> 9.24) <translate>degrees</translate>. <translate>The average of LG angles was 42.95</translate><math>\pm</math>11.78 <translate>degrees</translate>. <br><translate>Data collection emerged from the conception of a new TMD paradigm in which the affected side could be the usual chewing side, the side where the mandibular lateral kinematic angle was flatter</translate>. <translate>This parameter may also be compatible with the dental claim</translate>.

<translate>The CPs were assessed using conventional axiography and LG was assessed by using kinesiograph tracing</translate><ref>[https://www.myotronics.com/ Myotronics Inc., Kent, WA, US]</ref>; <translate>Seventeen (71%) of the 24 (100%) patients consistently showed a side of habitual chewing side. The mean and standard deviation of the CP angles was 47.90</translate> <math>\pm</math> 9.24) <translate>degrees</translate>. <translate>The average of LG angles was 42.95</translate><math>\pm</math>11.78 <translate>degrees</translate>. <br><translate>Data collection emerged from the conception of a new TMD paradigm in which the affected side could be the usual chewing side, the side where the mandibular lateral kinematic angle was flatter</translate>. <translate>This parameter may also be compatible with the dental claim</translate>.

<math>\delta_4=</math> '''EMG Intereference pattern:''' M.O. Mazzetto and coll.<ref>{{cite book  

<math>\delta_4=</math> '''<translate>EMG Intereference pattern</translate>:''' M.O. Mazzetto <translate>and</translate> coll.<ref>{{cite book  

  | autore = Oliveira Mazzetto M

  | autore = Oliveira Mazzetto M

  | autore2 = Almeida Rodrigues C

  | autore2 = Almeida Rodrigues C

  | DOI = 10.1590/0103-6440201302310

  | DOI = 10.1590/0103-6440201302310

  | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->

  | oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->

  }}</ref> showed that the electromyographic activity of the anterior temporal muscles and the masseter was positively correlated with the "Craniomandibular index" 'indiced (CMI) with a <math>P=0,01</math> and suggesting that the use of CMI to quantify the severity of TMDs and EMG to assess the masticatory muscle function, may be an important diagnostic and therapeutic elements. These scientific references determine compatibility of the assertion.

  }}</ref> <translate>showed that the electromyographic activity of the anterior temporal muscles and the masseter was positively correlated with the "Craniomandibular index", indiced (CMI) with a <math>P=0,01</math> and suggesting that the use of CMI to quantify the severity of TMDs and EMG to assess the masticatory muscle function, may be an important diagnostic and therapeutic elements</translate>. <translate>These scientific references determine compatibility of the assertion</translate>.

<math>\delta_n=</math> Obviously the dentist colleague could go on making his statements indefinitely.

<math>\delta_n=</math> <translate>Obviously, the dentist colleague could endlessly keep on casting his statements, indefinitely</translate>.

Well, all of ''these statements seem coherent'' with the sentence <math>\Im</math> initially described, whereby the dentist colleague feels justified in saying that the set of sentences <math>\Im</math>, and a number <math>n\geq1</math> of other assertions or clinical data <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math>are logically compatible as the union between them <math>\Im\cup\{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n\}</math> it is coherent.

<translate>Well</translate>, ''<translate>all of these statements seem coherent</translate>'' <translate>with the sentence</translate> <math>\Im</math> <translate>initially described</translate>, <translate>whereby the dentist colleague feels justified in saying that the set of sentences</translate> <math>\Im</math>, <translate>and a number</translate> <math>n\geq1</math> <translate>of other assertions or clinical data</translate> <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> <translate>are logically compatible as the union between them</translate> <math>\Im\cup\{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n\}</math> <translate>is coherent</translate>.

{{q4|Following the logic of classical language, the dentist is right!|It would seem! but be careful, only in own dental context!}}

{{q4|<translate>Following the logic of classical language, the dentist is right</translate>!|<translate>It would seem so</translate>! <br><translate>But, be careful, only in his own dental context</translate>!}}

This statement is so true that the <math>P-value</math> could be infinitely extended enough to have <math>\alpha=0</math> that corrisponde in an infinite significance as long as it remains limited in its context without, however, meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts as neurologist one.

 

<translate>This statement is so true that the</translate> <math><translate>P-value</translate></math> <translate>could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an</translate> <math>\alpha=0</math> <translate>that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance</translate>.

==Final considerations==

==Final considerations==